Category: ART


DIARY COMICS :: Feb 16-21, 2010

March 10th, 2010 — 10:08 am

New diary comics dudes! You can click on any of the images to see them on Flickr, along with the rest of them going back to January 1. Or just click here to see the whole set!

dailies_10-0216_1940_10-0217_1920

dailies_10-0217_2010_10-0218_2145

dailies_10-0218_2330_10-0219_2120

dailies_10-0220_0920_2230

dailies_10-0221_0015_10-0222_1610

I cannot overstate (so far) how much more awesome the State Employee’s Credit Union is than Bank of America. Or any other bank I’ve ever had an account at. Although SECU has now messed up my checks twice, but on the other hand I have yet to get charged for pretty much anything. OH EXCEPT THE $1/MONTH SERVICE CHARGE WHICH IS IT THAT’S ALL THE ONLY CHARGE CAN YOU BELIEVE IT? I love it.

4 comments » | ART, ART :: Sketches, ART :: Strips

NEW STRIP :: POISON IVY Page 5/10

March 8th, 2010 — 11:43 am

Oh man. This week’s strip is up. Warning: it’s super-mortifying if you have allergies to ponytails with the sides sort of half-shaved, or chin beards, or any of a number of other problematic choices I made throughout my life. God only knows what I will think of how I look right now in another few years.

I’ll probably be like, “GORGEOUS!” though, actually. Gorgeous.

7 comments » | ART, ART :: Strips

SKETCHBOOK, OSCARS, THE MOON

March 6th, 2010 — 11:29 am

Well heckfire, no one showed up for my comics class this morning. I wish I could have seen myself hanging around the (locked) classroom door for half-an-hour before I left; I would have stayed asleep instead of waking up and finishing my class notes through a fugue of hangover. Well I’m awake now. Time to get productive Dharbin! Or at least continue waking up, because boy oh boy, that is a work in progress today.

SKETCHBOOK SPREAD | Pages 76-77

I have been thinking this week about the Oscars: I just don’t get them. Is there a reason for them? I understand the awards part, but isn’t it just a reason for movie studios to promote their movies, get more people to go see The Hurt Locker or whatever?

And even that isn’t bad, that’s how our government is run too right? People spend millions AND MILLIONS of dollars to get into office, then spend their time their struggling to raise more money so they can stay in that office. Somewhere in there they make a lot of speeches cynically aimed at the stupidest and most impressionable parts of their perceived constituencies, and at least once or twice they vote for or against something. Afterwards I think there’s a party, with a lot of backslapping and cigar smoking.

SKETCHBOOK SPREAD | Pages 78-79

But the thing that KILLS me about the Oscars is all the money that’s spent on the actual event. Not just the production costs, swag bags, all that–it’s the clothes baby, what’s the deal with all those clothes?? In a time when the entire nation of Haiti is more or less a pile of treeless rubble, sprinkled with tarp lean-to’s, and the rainy season about to begin… the best thing we as a society can do is throw a party for the movie industry.

And just to remind us of how important this party is, everyone should show up in $20,000 designer dresses or Versace tuxedoes, casually displaying their fancy shoes or handbags or dogs or whatever, as they pause to endure 2 minutes of flashbulbs on the (tented) red carpet before entering and practicing not looking directly into any of the hundred or so moving cameras.

Afterwards, they will complain bitterly about how celebrities have no privacy, how fame ruins everything, how “regular” people just don’t understand the incredible pressure.

SKETCHBOOK SPREAD | Pages 80-81

That sounds pretty negative, I guess. But it’s gross, honestly. The idea of spending tens of millions of dollars on a big party when there are starving people literally everywhere is just nuts. Or sending a rocket to the moon for… for what? I love space, I love astronauts, NASA is like a codeword for “awesome.” But worrying about sending a manned mission to Mars when we have two very foggy wars going on, 10% unemployment, an increasingly monetized political system, and natural disasters all over the place.

Well, pardon me for saying that it sucks. But it does. SUXXXXX2000

Oh! I nearly forgot to mention that I put these three spreads up in my Flickr set, which will eventually comprise this entire 108-page or so sketchbook. You can click on any of the pictures to see them in Flickr, or here for the whole set. Hope you like it yo!

5 comments » | ART, ART :: Sketches, OPINION, OPINION :: Television

PROCESS PHOTOS, COVERED, POOR LITTLE RICH DHARB

March 4th, 2010 — 01:33 am

So Robert Goodin asked me to do something for the Covered art show going on this month in Los Angeles, at Secret Headquarters. Before I get into all the boring art talk, I should say that you should go; I wish I could afford to go, but Los Angeles is a long drive for me. Hopefully less long for you. You can also see all the pieces in the show on their Flickr page, along with prices and info on how you can buy them, regardless of your location.

covered-flyer

If you don’t know, Covered is a blog Rob started around a year or two ago, which is basically artists re-interpreting classic or favorite or just weird comics covers. It’s cool. Rob gets a lot of big names, and a lot of small names, and the takes run from faithful to weird and back again. I love it.

But I had a really hard time thinking of something to do, I came down to either “The Ark” (one of the Jack Chick “Crusaders” line of comics); or the Frazetta cover to Weird Science-Fantasy, the famous one with the spaceman fighting the cavemen; or the one I did. Honestly I was about to pull out of the show; I just didn’t have any time, and I’m trying not to do non-paying work, especially since I have undone commissions for some very patient clients.

covered_richie-rich-141_process_cover

But I’m glad I did now–drawing Richie Rich was so pleasant, I can’t even tell you. Weirdly, it made me feel really grown-up–I still have most of my comics from when I was a kid, and most of them are Richie Rich comics. So the cover above is something I’ve been seeing–something that’s a part of my inner visual lexicon–for the last 25-30 years. Richie Rich might be one of the single biggest influences on my own approach to cartooning, but this was the first time in my entire life including childhood, that I ever tried to actually draw him. In effect I was using adult skills to really look deeply at something from my childhood. It felt strange and great and sad.

covered_richie-rich-141_process_pencils-sketch

The thing about Richie Rich–leaving the weirdness of the comics themselves out–is his design: it’s nuts. His head is nearly as big as the entire rest of his body, he’s got these kooky cankle legs that actually seem to get larger the closer you get to his feet, and he wears an insane black suit/blue shorts/white boots combo, that’s set off jauntily by his massive red bow tie. But what really makes his design is the shape of his head, specifically the way the line of his forehead-to-cheek swoops in and out expressively. You could always tell a crummy Richie Rich artist by this line–if that line doesn’t work, the whole face falls apart. Oops I’m digressing.

covered_richie-rich-141_process_pencils-bike-start

Okay so anyway I started drawing Richie Rich #141. I’m pretty anal, and didn’t have a lot of time, so I did a lot of measuring and mathematizing to make sure I could fit everything in–instead of, say, having to cram in the last couple of letters in the title or squoosh the bike wheel a little to keep them in frame. Or getting most of the way done and then having to start over. I draw small, so I made it 5.75″ x 8.5″, which is around 30% smaller than the original. Then I just took measurements and divided them by 1.325 to transfer them to the smaller paper.

I basically mapped out where the different title elements would go, as well as the top and sides of the figure, assuming the bottom dimension would just naturally work fine, since there was so much negative space in the composition and I was leaving out the “detectives” subtitle. I actually ended up with too much negative space at the bottom, but by the time I realized this, I had a set of pencils I was pretty happy with, so I just decided to say eff it and go ahead.

covered_richie-rich-141_process_pencils-midway

I have a weird approach to drawing, and not at all a healthy one–when I draw things I draw their component pieces one at a time, in relation to each other, rather than sketching out the whole thing and then firming up proportions as I go. So a lot of times when I draw from some reference, whether it’s life or another sketch or something like this where I’m straight-up copying, everything looks perfect but there’s an unsettling element somewhere, like the person’s legs are double long or short or the roof of the house is pitched nearly vertical.

In this case it fortunately manifested itself as drawing Richie bigger in ratio to his bike–both the bike and Richie are more or less correct, just not in relation to one another. But that’s not the sort of thing people notice, and for some reason I liked it anyway–it fits the way I’ve skewed the point of the original cover. So, a narrow miss!

covered_richie-rich-141_process_pencils-finished

I was happy enough with the pencils, in fact, that I was terrified to ink them; I was pretty certain I’d screw them up. Especially since I’ve been using nibs for the last few months, and am way out of practice with my trusty Kuretake brush pen.

covered_richie-rich-141_process_inking-figure-big-lines

The big lines for me are the tricky ones; I always draw them first, and they always looks terrible until you start filling in the other lines around them.

covered_richie-rich-141_process_inking-figure-smaller-lines

Like so. This is something I wish someone who knows about it would just sit down and teach me, this thick-to-thin ration that makes certain cartoons work. For instance, the cartooning math that decrees that Richie’s head should have a big chunky “holding” line–but that nearly every other line should be of a single weight, and pretty fine at that. I drew all the non-weighted lines with a .005 black Micron pen, which is the smallest one; even as small as I draw the idea of using the Micron for the actual basic lines in a cartoon is crazy.

Anyway, I know there is some cartooning science to this, but I can’t quite put my finger on it. But I want to. I want to put my finger on that science! Because Warren Kremer, who was either the original or one of the original Richie Rich artists, and very likely the artist I’m ripping off paying homage to here, has definitely got it. In spades.

covered_richie-rich-141_process_inking-figure-midway

It’s like the fat lines are bringing forms out of the more mundane shapes in the background almost. But that’s not quite it either. Heck I don’t know. But it was awfully fun to ink, maybe one of the most fun things I’ve ever inked. If someone gets the license to Richie Rich and wants to pay me to ink them, I will take that money. You’ll have to get a good artist to draw them though.

covered_richie-rich-141_process_inking-figure-finished

Figure’s all done, next up: lettering! Surprisingly, most of my mistakes on this are in the lettering, which I got a little overconfident on. I like lettering and enjoy making it, and just sort of assumed that lettering the small stuff wouldn’t be nearly as hard as getting the big line around Richie’s head right.

richie-rich_141_inks_700px

Still, much as you reduce art for print to smooth out visible errors, by drawing pretty small it makes errors hard to see sometimes, because they are after all tiny.

covered_richie-rich-141_process_pre-coloring

I spent  a long time trying to puzzle out how best to approximate the original colors, but ended up ditching the blue background. I couldn’t get a Copic marker to match, and all my blending attempts were either too dull or too bright; the closest one would have meant I hatched the whole background with a blue Micron over a gray marker underlayer. I ended up just doing the underlayer and leaving it at that. Why screw it up just for the dropped background?

richie-rich_141_colors_700px

And there you go! I cannot overstate how much I enjoyed making this, it was the best. Seriously, someone get that Richie Rich license and pay me to do something with it. I don’t think I could compose new Richie’s in this smooth style, but I would love to be involved with something nevertheless with someone who could.

covered_richie-rich-141_process_framed

One $12 Target frame later, and it’s ready to be packed up and shipped off to Sunny California! The show starts this Friday, March 6, and will last throughout the month. Rob is putting up a new piece from the show each day on the Covered blog, so you can see them there, or if you’d like a sneak peek (and/or to purchase one OR EVEN MINE AHEM AHEM, you can check out the Secret Headquarters Flickr set devoted to the show! Okay time for bed it’s late!

12 comments » | ART, ART :: Commissions, NEWS, NEWS :: Events, NEWS :: Other Places I Am

NEW STRIP :: “POISON IVY”, Page 4/10

March 1st, 2010 — 12:26 pm

Continuing my tale of itchy youth! Man, I have a lot of stories that take place at the camp I mention on this page, but I will leave those for their own cartoons later. I loved it though. My memories of school and camp and all that are mostly pretty positive; I’m always surprised by how many people hate those times in their lives. I would go back in a second, I sure would. In a SECOND!

Comment » | ART, ART :: Strips

BOURNE SUPREMACY, VISUAL STORYTELLING, MANDIBULAR BUTTS

February 25th, 2010 — 11:05 am

SKETCHBOOK SPREAD | Pages 68-69

Oh man. I watched The Bourne Supremacy last week, and it’s still on my mind. Man, it was good, way WAY better than I expected. I remember liking the first movie alright, but I read and reread the book throughout middle and high school and beyond, and knew the story well enough that I was distracted from the movie by the adaptation, does that make sense? Robert Ludlum did write Bourne Supremacy and Bourne Ultimatum books before he died, but if I’ve ever read Supremacy I can’t really remember doing so, and I know I never made it to Ultimatum. So going into the movie, I figured it was just the mediocre second chapter in a franchise, and I was looking to watch a loud action movie basically.

SKETCHBOOK SPREAD | Pages 72-73

Which it was, definitely. But what was shocking about Bourne Supremacy the movie was how well it was told–literally, I was shocked. I’m not the most, or even the much, sophisticated movie-watcher in the world, and I kind of like it that way. I like not knowing enough about movies, so as to be genuinely transported by them, which I was during Bourne Supremacy. The story was, well, whatever–there wasn’t that much story really, just a continuation of the original superspy-killing-machine-with-amnesia plot.

But the telling! The entire story takes place on the hoof, with someone (usually Bourne) speeding or running or limping somewhere, being chased by the governments of a few nations and worse. But more than that, it’s how the director chose to show the story that made the movie so enjoyable. He moves the camera around at such a blistering speed, that you never have an opportunity to feel “placed” as an observer–it has the effect of keeping you as semi-confused and off-balance as the film’s protagonist. How easy is it for a schlub sitting on his sofa in Charlotte with Oreo crumbs on his chest to identify with an amnesiac master assassin in Berlin? I’m not really interested in violence or spies or all that, but there I was in the middle of the day with my heart in my throat. I love it!

SKETCHBOOK SPREAD | Pages 74-75

I don’t know or understand much about cinematography, but I’ve been struggling lately in my comics with how to stage panels, how much to show, how to make the panels more interesting, change camera angles and perspectives, bring a reader into things instead of just merely reading. Watching the last big scene of the movie, the big car chase in Moscow, I was on the edge of my seat, and only afterwards realized that the reason was that I was in all the shots, I was being moved and jerked around just like the subjects of the shots. Whoever edited this scene below must have biceps in their eyeballs; I cannot imagine how long it must have taken to edit this movie.  BUT: pretty sure this scene is spoilery–it is after all the big climax. So don’t watch it if you haven’t seen the movie, or if you ever intend to.

Oh! I almost forgot, I put these three sketchbook spreads up in my Flickr set devoted to that sort of thing–I think I’m about 2/3 of the way to having that whole sketchbook up online, which is cool (maybe). I think so, anyway. Shutup.

4 comments » | ART, ART :: Sketches, OPINION, OPINION :: Film

NEW STRIP :: Poison Ivy, Page 3/10

February 23rd, 2010 — 03:47 pm

New strip is up, yo! Still working kinks out of this style, changing some stuff here and there. Sweetest change that worked out is that this original is on cream card-stock I bought at Kinko’s, and it’s all in dip pen. Makes it both harder and easier, but I love how chunky it makes the lines. So hope you dig that.

But in this case, super time consuming, so that’s all I have to say for now. Lots to do today, let’s get to work! Okay everybody let’s do it!

4 comments » | ART, ART :: Strips

DIARY COMICS ARE FASTER TO DO, IT’S TRUE

February 22nd, 2010 — 11:14 am

This week’s strip is going to be a day late, as I’m, well, still working on it. I’m also struggling to finish my piece for the Covered art show going on in LA in March. So wish me luck on that badboy, I’ll be chained to my drawing board all day inking and coloring and likely ruining the very nice pencils I did for it. Oh and my strip too, it’s looking sweet as well–could be a good week for Dharbin comics!

Or an abject failure. TIME WILL TELL! In the meantime, here are some more diary comics, the entire set of which you can read in order at Flickr.

7 comments » | ART, ART :: Sketches, ART :: Strips

SKETCHBOOK A GO-GO

February 17th, 2010 — 10:31 am

SKETCHBOOK SPREAD | Pages 28-29

I’ve been listening to a lot of Coleman Hawkins lately. When I first got into jazz in high school, it was Duke Ellington, there was just something about him. While he’s easily most known as a “swing” or “big band” composer and bandleader, there’s something so SMOOTH about Duke Ellington. So smooth, in fact, that even a 16-year old kid could “get” it, not to mention the same kid almost 20 years later. Lots of range in there, you know what I mean? I think it’s part of what made him so successful in his day, there was enough range in his music for the dummies and the snobs alike.

SKETCHBOOK SPREAD | Pages 34-35

But I wasn’t really into “swing” music that much, especially when that weird fad hit in the 90’s and people were actually wearing zoot suits and taking swing dance lessons? Remember that? Yes you do. You probably bought that Brian Setzer Orchestra album didn’t you? DIDN’T YOU? Anyway, by then I was living with The Piemaker and had been exposed to what I still think of as the apogee of American jazz, the period between 1950 and 1970, including the best of Coltrane, Davis, Mingus, etc. To a 20-something, swing music lacked the sort of raw spirituality, the passion, the searching quality of more “out” jazz.

SKETCHBOOK SPREAD | Pages 52-53

But man–there’s something to be said for smoothness, even so. John Coltrane was an extraordinary musician, moreso an extraordinary composer and soloist. But the early guys, new as their artform was, had an impossibly perfect technique; they were the Bachs and Beethovens of the early 20th century–and remember that in a very real sense they just made jazz up. Bach and Beethoven had hundreds of years of development preceding them to take advantage of; Fats Waller and Art Tatum and Duke Ellington likely had living relatives who had been slaves.

Slaves! Crazy.

Anyway, check out my man Coleman “Bean” Hawkins, playing the standard “Body and Soul.” If you’re not into jazz necessarily, just pay attention to his breathing, how much air he puts into each note. Pretty amazing.

Oh yeah I almost forgot to mention, I put some more sketchook pages up in my Flickr set collecting my entire last sketchbook.

Comment » | ART, ART :: Sketches, OPINION, OPINION :: Music

NEW STRIP :: POISON IVY, Pages 1-2

February 15th, 2010 — 09:49 am

Beginning this week, a new story which will be 10 pages I think, or at least that’s how many in the strip. I might drag it out an extra page depending on how the panels shake out.

I’m more excited about this story than usual, because for the first time I’m starting to get closer to the kind of simple, clean, open style I want, without all the gobbledygook and crosshatching and stuff I normally throw in there to cover for bad composition. The extra plus is that it’s much faster to do pages when you fill big spaces with white or black instead of a million useless details. Progress feels good! I hope you guys like it.

5 comments » | ART, ART :: Strips

« Previous Entries